Duchamp and Dali
Photographing the naked object
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64166/t9k4tk51Abstract
This paper centers on two photographs whose objects of focus define significant signposts in the two complex, at times paradox-ridden trajectories of Marcel Duchamp’s and Salvador Dalí’s respective involvement with photography. One of these objects is a white “threadless spool” seen in the lower portion of an anonymous photograph accompanying Dalí’s 1935 essay “Non-Euclidean Psychology of a Photograph.” The other is a readymade appearing as a white silhouette in a photograph of Duchamp’s studio, one constituting an interim stage in his preparatory work on the Boîte-en-valise, or “Box in a Suitcase,” a kind of portable museum of his works on which he worked from 1938 and practically until 1971. The photograph to which Dalí refers serves as a launch pad for an “interpretative” feat employing his paranoiac-critical method, presenting a complex tale of the changing circumstances of the threadless spool in the light of philosophical and scientific thought, past and present. Dalí places the spool on the opposite pole to metaphysical abstraction and closer to modern physics, thus arguing that it is non-Euclidean because its situation is defined not in terms of classical space and time, but in those of the theory of relativity. He then places the spool at the meeting point of modern psychology and physics, defining the photograph itself as embodying a psychological non-Euclidean dimension. The photograph of Duchamp’s studio, with “Trébuchet,” a coat hanger, as one of the readymades placed there, represents a stage in the complex process of preparing it for publication in the Boîte-en-valise, when the object, after being rendered separately in the style of a mechanical drawing, was whitened out. Later in the process, the detailed drawing was printed over the whitened area and the whole photograph was colored. The reason for whitening out the image might be associated with Duchamp’s investigations of the notion of the fourth dimension, as described and developed in his notes over the years. I have found a significant congruence between his ideas in this respect and the stages of re-fashioning the photograph. Duchamp’s “Trébuchet,” in its pristine, 300Abstracts white, and naked state, forms part of a conceptualization process of the photo itself. The fourth dimension is virtualized through various symbolic actions of the kind employed by Duchamp. With this photograph as well as others included in the Boîte-en-valise, he challenges photography’s conventional task of serving as a faithful documentation of visible reality. For his part, Dalí employed photographs over the years as conceptual tools, both as vehicles for the evocation of surreality, in the early years, and later as embodying a non-Euclidean psychological dimension or as vehicles for provoking paranoiac critical interpretation.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mabatim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice
The article is an original work, created solely by the author, and has not been previously published, in whole or in part, in any journal, book, or other publication, whether in print or online, in an academic or any other context.
The article is not under review, consideration, or submission to any other journal or publisher.
Copyright in the article is held by the author.
The article does not contain obscene, defamatory, libelous, or otherwise unlawful material, nor does it infringe upon privacy rights, and to the best of the author’s knowledge does not violate any applicable law.
Publication of the article does not constitute an offense or violation of any law and does not infringe upon the rights of any third party, including intellectual property rights and copyrights of any individual or entity.
Full and exclusive responsibility for securing written permission to use any visual materials not owned by the author rests with the author.
The author bears full and exclusive responsibility for the content of the article. The journal Mabatim shall bear no responsibility in cases of plagiarism or any other infringement committed by the author.
The author undertakes to indemnify and hold the publisher harmless against any damages, losses, expenses, or payments (including legal costs and attorneys’ fees) arising from any claim, demand, or legal proceeding related to the content of the article.
The author acknowledges that any transfer of copyright must be executed in writing between the journal Mabatim and the author.


