Environment, Touch, and Dirt in Contemporary Indian Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64166/na4e8c98Abstract
In recent years, Indian art has witnessed the increasing presence of artists who identify with the Dalit political struggle. These artists critically examine the Subcontinent’s caste system from the perspective of those excluded from it and branded as untouchable. The article examines the junction between their political art, which criticizes social discrimination, and environmental art. In order to analyze artworks that respond to what Mukul Sharma calls Dalit ecologies, the article reviews the theories of the British anthropologist Mary Douglas and the Indian historian and theorist Dipesh Chakrabarty, who defines the Indian approach to dirt as an expression of civil disobedience. The article also follows the transformation in Chakrabarty’s thought over the last two decades. A member of the Subaltern Studies Group (SSG) and a leading thinker of postcolonial theory, Chakrabarty now engages with ecological concerns. Even though this turn has pushed the issue of social discrimination to the margins, I argue that Chakrabarty’s discussion of Dalit politics can be read as a decolonial critique of modern epistemology and of how it shapes politics and the relationship between humans and nonhumans. While analyzing the artworks, I show how the artists undermine the ways human society treats dirt and establishes its outside.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mabatim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice
The article is an original work, created solely by the author, and has not been previously published, in whole or in part, in any journal, book, or other publication, whether in print or online, in an academic or any other context.
The article is not under review, consideration, or submission to any other journal or publisher.
Copyright in the article is held by the author.
The article does not contain obscene, defamatory, libelous, or otherwise unlawful material, nor does it infringe upon privacy rights, and to the best of the author’s knowledge does not violate any applicable law.
Publication of the article does not constitute an offense or violation of any law and does not infringe upon the rights of any third party, including intellectual property rights and copyrights of any individual or entity.
Full and exclusive responsibility for securing written permission to use any visual materials not owned by the author rests with the author.
The author bears full and exclusive responsibility for the content of the article. The journal Mabatim shall bear no responsibility in cases of plagiarism or any other infringement committed by the author.
The author undertakes to indemnify and hold the publisher harmless against any damages, losses, expenses, or payments (including legal costs and attorneys’ fees) arising from any claim, demand, or legal proceeding related to the content of the article.
The author acknowledges that any transfer of copyright must be executed in writing between the journal Mabatim and the author.


